Which of the following is a benefit of effective para-verbal communication during crisis intervention?

Effective para-verbal communication during crisis intervention significantly helps in establishing rapport between the intervenor and the individual experiencing the crisis. This type of communication includes factors such as tone of voice, volume, and pacing, which are essential for conveying empathy, understanding, and support. When a person in crisis feels heard and understood through effective para-verbal communication, they are more likely to respond positively, thus creating a more conducive environment for resolution.

This rapport-building aspect is critical in de-escalating potentially volatile situations. By using a calm and reassuring tone, for example, the intervenor can help diminish the individual's distress and foster a sense of safety. This process encourages cooperation and openness, making it easier to navigate the conversation towards resolution.

The other options do not align with the core value of para-verbal communication. Increasing the likelihood of physical confrontation contradicts the goals of crisis intervention, which aims to de-escalate situations rather than provoke them. While effective communication can reduce the need for physical interventions, it does not completely eliminate the need in every situation, as there may still be circumstances requiring additional safety measures. Lastly, while the choice of words is important in communication, para-verbal communication focuses more on how those words are delivered rather than just the words